NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+38%
2.974 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+3%
2096
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+83%
1723
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
1024
Shading Units
1152
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GP106
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
