NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 239W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 SDI
+141%
5.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
239W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
3x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK110
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
