NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
+86%
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2496
64
TMUs
208
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
