Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +480%
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy