Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Boost Clock924MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +484%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
350W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy