Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile +106%
2.122 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
-
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy