Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.13GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile +9126%
2.122 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
-
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
12W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy