NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
GRID K2
+7%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
695 MHz
Base Clock
-
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
