Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1700MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
13440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +3307%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
220
640
Shading Units
14080
40
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
153 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy