Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +4744%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G86
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy