Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +1111%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT216
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy