Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +3093%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT218
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy