Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +422%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF108
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N12M-Q3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy