Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +171%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy