Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 64GB VRAM Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB +279%
5.325 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
204.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.60 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
83.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.662 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA10B
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

55W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy