NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GRID M40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
+77%
1.405 TFLOPS
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GM107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
