NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla T10 Processor to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
+187%
1.786 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 Processor
0.622 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Tesla T10 Processor
+571%
188
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
188W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GT200B
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
