NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
+73%
1.786 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
448
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
247W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GF110
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
