NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M1200 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1148MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M1200 Mobile
1.469 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+141%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M1200 Mobile
150
Quadro K5200
+95%
293
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
991 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1148 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
18.37 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
45.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1469 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
45.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
