NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M1200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1148MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M1200 Mobile
1.469 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
+55%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
991 MHz
Base Clock
-
1148 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
18.37 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
45.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1469 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
45.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
