Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1000M +38%
1.017 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

15.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1017 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK107
N16P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy