NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
+19%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GF110
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
