Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +2875%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
G86
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy