NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1124MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+311%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K620M
82
Quadro K5200
+257%
293
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GK110B
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
