Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
312 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 45W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +432%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
9
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
72
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GT215
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.727 billion
Unknown
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy