NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA GRID K100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
+164%
0.863 TFLOPS
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GK107
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
