Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1600MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +5975%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
100 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1280 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy