Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1597MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB +1794%
16.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1245 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1597 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
204.4 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
511.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.71 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.35 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.177 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GV100
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy