NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
+14%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K620
+40%
696
Quadro K3000M
495
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
576
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
