NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
+165%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
