Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (239W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
11200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 SDI
5.196 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +821%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
220
2880
Shading Units
14080
240
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

239W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
3x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 3x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy