NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+4158%
14.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
192
Shading Units
5888
16
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
41W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
