NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1252MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+454%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
+238%
2072
Quadro P400
612
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
+380%
941
Quadro P400
196
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
256
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
