NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1480MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+87%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
+31%
2072
Quadro P1000
1572
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
+28%
941
Quadro P1000
733
Blender
Quadro K5200
+89%
293
Quadro P1000
155
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
2304
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
47W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
