Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +384%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy