Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +741%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy