NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
G71
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0
