Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1200MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +237%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
3328
128
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA106
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy