NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M
+57%
1.615 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1344
Shading Units
448
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF100
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
