Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 +62%
2.169 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy