NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000
2.169 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+674%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
122W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
