NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+2%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
