NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+182%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
576
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
