Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition +653%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy