NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+1607%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1536
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
122W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
