NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (1569MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+281%
8.033 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200
32
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+293%
126
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1344
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
