NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1395MHz vs 784MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+374%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
1344
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU102
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
