NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID M40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
+165%
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM107
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
