NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+81%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1152
Shading Units
896
96
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU117B
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
