Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +817%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
4608
96
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU102
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy